American Educational Research Journal

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for free access to the SAGE eReference platform!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fuchs, L. S.
Right arrow Articles by Stecker, P. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 28, No. 3, 617-641 (1991)
DOI: 10.3102/00028312028003617


Articles

Effects of Curriculum-Based Measurement and Consultation on Teacher Planning and Student Achievement in Mathematics Operations

Lynn S. Fuchs, Douglas Fuchs Carol L. Hamlett and Pamela M. Stecker

Vanderbilt University

The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of (a) ongoing, systematic assessment of student growth (i.e., curriculum-based measurement) and (b) expert system instructional consultation on teacher planning and student achievement in the area of mathematics operations. Thirty-three teachers were assigned randomly to treatment groups: curriculum-based measurement (CBM) with expert system instructional consultation (CBM-ExS), CBM with no expert system instructional consultation (CBM-NExS), and control (i.e., no CBM). Teachers implemented treatments for 20 weeks. Analyses indicated that, compared to the control group, both CBM groups appeared to revise students’ instructional programs more frequently. However, only the CBM-ExS group effected superior student achievement. Analysis of the nature of teachers’ instructional adjustments indicated that the teaching revisions of the CBM-ExS teachers incorporated a dual focus on what types of problems to teach and what strategies to employ for teaching. By contrast, the CBM-NExS teachers focused solely on what types of problems to reteach. Findings are discussed in terms of previous studies of teacher planning and implications for practice.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Assessment for Effective InterventionHome page
M. B. Calhoon
Curriculum-Based Measurement for Mathematics at the High School Level: What We Do Not Know . . . What We Need to Know
Assessment for Effective Intervention, September 1, 2008; 33(4): 234 - 239.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Remedial and Special EducationHome page
M. B. Calhoon, R. W. Emerson, M. Flores, and D. E. Houchins
Computational Fluency Performance Profile of High School Students With Mathematics Disabilities
Remedial and Special Education, October 1, 2007; 28(5): 292 - 303.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Special EducationHome page
A. Foegen, C. Jiban, and S. Deno
Progress Monitoring Measures in Mathematics: A Review of the Literature
Journal of Special Education, August 1, 2007; 41(2): 121 - 139.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Assessment for Effective InterventionHome page
J. M. Leh, A. K. Jitendra, G. I. L. Caskie, and C. C. Griffin
An Evaluation of Curriculum-Based Measurement of Mathematics Word Problem--Solving Measures for Monitoring Third-Grade Students' Mathematics Competence
Assessment for Effective Intervention, January 1, 2007; 32(2): 90 - 99.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Assessment for Effective InterventionHome page
G. H. Noell and K. A. Gansle
Assuring the Form Has Substance: Treatment Plan Implementation as the Foundation of Assessing Response to Intervention
Assessment for Effective Intervention, January 1, 2006; 32(1): 32 - 39.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Assessment for Effective InterventionHome page
E. S. Shapiro, L. Edwards, and N. Zigmond
Progress Monitoring of Mathematics Among Students with Learning Disabilities
Assessment for Effective Intervention, January 1, 2005; 30(2): 15 - 32.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Assessment for Effective InterventionHome page
L. S. Fuchs, D. Fuchs, and S. J. Courey
Curriculum-Based Measurement of Mathematics Competence: From Computation to Concepts and Applications to Real-Life Problem Solving
Assessment for Effective Intervention, January 1, 2005; 30(2): 33 - 46.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Assessment for Effective InterventionHome page
A. M. VanDerHeyden and M. K. Burns
Using Curriculum-Based Assessment and Curriculum-Based Measurement to Guide Elementary Mathematics Instruction: Effect on Individual and Group Accountability Scores
Assessment for Effective Intervention, January 1, 2005; 30(3): 15 - 31.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Early InterventionHome page
A. M. Vanderheyden, C. Broussard, M. Fabre, J. Stanley, J. Legendre, and R. Creppell
Development and Validation of Curriculum-Based Measures of Math Performance for Preschool Children
Journal of Early Intervention, October 1, 2004; 27(1): 27 - 41.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Special EducationHome page
S. L. Deno
Developments in Curriculum-Based Measurement
Journal of Special Education, November 1, 2003; 37(3): 184 - 192.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Remedial and Special EducationHome page
M. B. Calhoon and L. S. Fuchs
The Effects of Peer-Assisted Learning Strategies and Curriculum-Based Measurement on the Mathematics Performance of Secondary Students with Disabilities
Remedial and Special Education, August 1, 2003; 24(4): 235 - 245.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Special EducationHome page
R. Helwig, L. Anderson, and G. Tindal
Using a Concept-Grounded, Curriculum-Based Measure in Mathematics to Predict Statewide Test Scores for Middle School Students with LD
Journal of Special Education, August 1, 2002; 36(2): 102 - 112.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Assessment for Effective InterventionHome page
K. McMaster, D. Fuchs, L. S. Fuchs, and D. L. Compton
Monitoring the Academic Progress of Children Who Are Unresponsive to Generally Effective Early Reading Intervention
Assessment for Effective Intervention, January 1, 2002; 27(4): 23 - 33.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Special EducationHome page
A. Foegen and S. L. Deno
Identifying Growth Indicators for Low-Achieving Students in Middle School Mathematics
Journal of Special Education, April 1, 2001; 35(1): 4 - 16.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Special EducationHome page
A. Foegen, C. A. Espin, R. M. Allinder, and M. A. Markell
Translating Research Into Practice: Preservice Teachers' Beliefs About Curriculum-Based Measurement
Journal of Special Education, January 1, 2001; 34(4): 226 - 236.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Remedial and Special EducationHome page
R. M. Allinder, R. M. Bolling, R. G. Oats, and W. A. Gagnon
Effects of Teacher Self-Monitoring on Implementation of Curriculum-Based Measurement and Mathematics Computation Achievement of Students with Disabilities
Remedial and Special Education, July 1, 2000; 21(4): 219 - 226.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Assessment for Effective InterventionHome page
A. Foegen
Technical Adequacy of General Outcome Measures for Middle School Mathematics
Assessment for Effective Intervention, January 1, 2000; 25(3): 175 - 203.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Assessment for Effective InterventionHome page
J. Bentz and S. Pavri
Curriculum-Based Measurement in Assessing Bilingual Students: A Promising New Direction
Assessment for Effective Intervention, January 1, 2000; 25(3): 229 - 248.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am Educ Res JHome page
L. S. Fuchs, D. Fuchs, K. Karns, C. L. Hamlett, M. Katzaroff, and S. Dutka
Effects of Task-Focused Goals on Low-Achieving Students With and Without Learning Disabilities
American Educational Research Journal, January 1, 1997; 34(3): 513 - 543.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHHome page
J. Woodward and H. Rieth
A Historical Review of Technology Research in Special Education
Review of Educational Research, January 1, 1997; 67(4): 503 - 536.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am Educ Res JHome page
L. S. Fuchs, D. Fuchs, J. Bentz, N. B. Phillips, and C. L. Hamlett
The Nature of Student Interactions During Peer Tutoring With and Without Prior Training and Experience
American Educational Research Journal, January 1, 1994; 31(1): 75 - 103.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am Educ Res JHome page
D. Fuchs, L. S. Fuchs, and P. Fernstrom
A Conservative Approach to Special Education Reform: Mainstreaming Through Transenvironmental Programming and Curriculum-Based Measurement
American Educational Research Journal, January 1, 1993; 30(1): 149 - 177.
[Abstract] [PDF]



AER home page RER home page EPA home page JEB home page RRE home page