American Educational Research Journal

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kulik, C.-L. C.
Right arrow Articles by Kulik, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 19, No. 3, 415-428 (1982)
DOI: 10.3102/00028312019003415
© 1982 American Educational Research Association

Articles

Effects of Ability Grouping on Secondary School Students: A Meta-analysis of Evaluation Findings

Chen-Lin C. Kulik and James A. Kulik

University of Michigan

This article reports results from a meta-analysis of findings from 52 studies of ability grouping carried out in secondary schools. In the typical study the benefits from grouping were small but significant on achievement examinations—an average increase of one-tenth standard deviations on examination scores, or an increase from the 50th to the 54th percentile for the typical student in a grouped class. The size of achievement effect differed in different types of studies of grouping, however. Studies in which high-ability students received enriched instruction in honors classes produced especially clear effects, for example, while studies of average and below average students produced near-zero effects. The benefits of grouping were also clear in the area of student attitudes. Students in grouped classes developed more positive attitudes toward the subjects they were studying than did students in ungrouped classes.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION AND POLICY ANALYSISHome page
J. P. Robinson
Evidence of a Differential Effect of Ability Grouping on the Reading Achievement Growth of Language-Minority Hispanics
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, June 1, 2008; 30(2): 141 - 180.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Gifted Child QuarterlyHome page
C. M. Callahan and T. R. Moon
Sorting the Wheat from the Chaff: What Makes for Good Evidence of Effectiveness in the Literature in Gifted Education?
Gifted Child Quarterly, October 1, 2007; 51(4): 305 - 319.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Gifted Child QuarterlyHome page
M. Neihart
The Socioaffective Impact of Acceleration and Ability Grouping: Recommendations for Best Practice
Gifted Child Quarterly, October 1, 2007; 51(4): 330 - 341.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHERHome page
L. Darling-Hammond
Third Annual Brown Lecture in Education Research The Flat Earth and Education: How America's Commitment to Equity Will Determine Our Future
Educational Researcher, August 1, 2007; 36(6): 318 - 334.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am Educ Res JHome page
Z. R. Mevarech and B. Kramarski
Improve: A Multidimensional Method For Teaching Mathematics in Heterogeneous Classrooms
American Educational Research Journal, January 1, 1997; 34(2): 365 - 394.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Gifted Child QuarterlyHome page
J. Tong and C. Yewchuk
Self-Concept and Sex-Role Orientation in Gifted High School Students
Gifted Child Quarterly, January 1, 1996; 40(1): 15 - 23.
[PDF]


Home page
EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION AND POLICY ANALYSISHome page
J. Kahne
Democratic Communities, Equity, and Excellence: A Deweyan Reframing of Educational Policy Analysis
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, January 1, 1994; 16(3): 233 - 248.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Gifted Child QuarterlyHome page
C. J. Mills and W. G. Durden
Cooperative Learning and Ability Grouping: An Issue of Choice
Gifted Child Quarterly, January 1, 1992; 36(1): 11 - 16.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Gifted Child QuarterlyHome page
J. F. Feldhusen and S. M. Moon
Grouping Gifted Students: Issues and Concerns
Gifted Child Quarterly, January 1, 1992; 36(2): 63 - 67.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Gifted Child QuarterlyHome page
J. VanTassel-Baska
Educational Decision Making on Acceleration and Grouping
Gifted Child Quarterly, January 1, 1992; 36(2): 68 - 72.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Gifted Child QuarterlyHome page
J. A. Kulik and C.-L. C. Kulik
Meta-analytic Findings on Grouping Programs
Gifted Child Quarterly, January 1, 1992; 36(2): 73 - 77.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Gifted Child QuarterlyHome page
A. E. Lupkowski, M. Whitmore, and A. Ramsay
The Impact of Early Entrance to College on Self-Esteem: A Preliminary Study
Gifted Child Quarterly, January 1, 1992; 36(2): 87 - 90.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION AND POLICY ANALYSISHome page
T. B. Hoffer
Middle School Ability Grouping and Student Achievement in Science and Mathematics
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, January 1, 1992; 14(3): 205 - 227.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Gifted Child QuarterlyHome page
J. J. Gallagher
Educational Reform, Values, and Gifted Students
Gifted Child Quarterly, January 1, 1991; 35(1): 12 - 19.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Gifted Child QuarterlyHome page
J. S. Renzulli and S. M. Reis
The Reform Movement and the Quiet Crisis in Gifted Education
Gifted Child Quarterly, January 1, 1991; 35(1): 26 - 35.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Gifted Child QuarterlyHome page
V. L. Vaughn, J. F. Feldhusen, and J. W. Asher
Meta-Analyses and Review of Research on Pull-Out Programs in Gifted Education
Gifted Child Quarterly, January 1, 1991; 35(2): 92 - 98.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am Educ Res JHome page
G. Farkas, D. Sheehan, and R. P Grobe
Coursework Mastery and School Success: Gender, Ethnicity, and Poverty Groups Within an Urban School District
American Educational Research Journal, January 1, 1990; 27(4): 807 - 827.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHHome page
R. E. Slavin
Achievement Effects of Ability Grouping in Secondary Schools: A Best-Evidence Synthesis
Review of Educational Research, January 1, 1990; 60(3): 471 - 499.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION AND POLICY ANALYSISHome page
J. Oakes
What Educational Indicators? The Case for Assessing the School Context
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, January 1, 1989; 11(2): 181 - 199.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
REVIEW OF RESEARCH IN EDUCATIONHome page
L. V. Jones
Chapter 8: School Achievement Trends in Mathematics and Science, and What Can Be Done to Improve Them
Review of Research in Education, January 1, 1988; 15(1): 307 - 341.
[PDF]


Home page
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHHome page
R. E. Slavin
Ability Grouping and Student Achievement in Elementary Schools: A Best-Evidence Synthesis
Review of Educational Research, January 1, 1987; 57(3): 293 - 336.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Gifted Child QuarterlyHome page
W. Asher
Conducting Research with Meta-Analysis: A New Direction for Gifted Education
Gifted Child Quarterly, January 1, 1986; 30(1): 7 - 10.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am Educ Res JHome page
R. E Slavin and N. L Karweit
Effects of Whole Class, Ability Grouped, and Individualized Instruction on Mathematics Achievement
American Educational Research Journal, January 1, 1985; 22(3): 351 - 367.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am Educ Res JHome page
E. J. Haller
Pupil Race and Elementary School Ability Grouping: Are Teachers Biased Against Black Children?
American Educational Research Journal, January 1, 1985; 22(4): 465 - 483.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am Educ Res JHome page
H. W Marsh
Self-Concept, Social Comparison, and Ability Grouping: A Reply to Kulik and Kulik
American Educational Research Journal, January 1, 1984; 21(4): 799 - 806.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHHome page
H. H. Marshall and R. S. Weinstein
Classroom Factors Affecting Students' Self-Evaluations: An Interactional Model
Review of Educational Research, January 1, 1984; 54(3): 301 - 325.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHHome page
J. A. Kulik and C.-L. C. Kulik
Effects of Accelerated Instruction on Students
Review of Educational Research, January 1, 1984; 54(3): 409 - 425.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHHome page
R. L. Bangert, J. A. Kulik, and C.-L. C. Kulik
Individualized Systems of Instruction in Secondary Schools
Review of Educational Research, January 1, 1983; 53(2): 143 - 158.
[Abstract] [PDF]



AER home page RER home page EPA home page JEB home page RRE home page