This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0002831208319733v1 45/4/1045    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Monte-Sano, C. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Qualities of Historical Writing Instruction: A Comparative Case Study of Two Teachers’ Practices

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: chauncey{at}umd.edu.

	Abstract

This study explored the practices of two high school teachers of U.S. history and their students’ performance on evidence-based history essays over 7 months. Data include pre- and posttest essays, interviews, observations, teacher feedback, assignments, and readings. Qualitative and quantitative comparisons of 42 students’ work show that one class improved in writing evidence-based history essays whereas the other did not. Qualitative analyses of the teachers’ practices suggest that different opportunities to learn to read, write, and think historically are not equally valuable. In particular, the following qualities of instruction support students’ development in writing evidence-based historical essays: approaching history as evidence-based interpretation; reading historical texts and considering them as interpretations; supporting reading comprehension and historical thinking; asking students to develop interpretations and support them with evidence; and using direct instruction, guided practice, independent practice, and feedback to teach evidence-based writing. The act of writing alone is not sufficient for growth in evidence-based historical writing.

First published on July 29, 2008, doi:10.3102/0002831208319733

American Educational Research Journal 2008;45:1045.

A more recent version of this article appeared on December 1, 2008


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?