This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0002831208329439v1 46/2/354    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Bastedo, M. N. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Conflicts, Commitments, and Cliques in the University: Moral Seduction as a Threat to Trustee Independence

University of Michigan

The ability of trustees to make independent judgments in the best interests of the university is a fundamental characteristic of an effective governing board. Trustee independence is increasingly threatened, however, as the university becomes more deeply embedded in government, industry, networks, and the professions. This topic is investigated through analysis of qualitative interviews, focus group observations, and informant-produced documents from 59 public university presidents. It is argued that threats to trustee independence are produced primarily through a process of moral seduction that allows trustees to engage in self-interested decision making while maintaining an ethical self-concept. The article then provides a conceptual model to frame our understanding of how important social actors seek to capture and co-opt boards of trustees to serve external interests and describes how the institutional mechanism of moral seduction creates important policy considerations.

Key Words: governance • postsecondary education • politics • qualitative research

This version was published on June 1, 2009

American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 46, No. 2, 354-386 (2009)
DOI: 10.3102/0002831208329439


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?