Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
American Educational Research Journal
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Raudenbush, S. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Section on Teaching, Learning, and Human Development Inaugural Special Issue: Perspectives on Future Research Directions

Advancing Educational Policy by Advancing Research on Instruction

Stephen W. Raudenbush

University of Chicago

Understanding the impact of "instructional regimes" on student learning is central to advancing educational policy. Research on instructional regimes has parallels with clinical trials in medicine yet poses unique challenges because of the social nature of instruction: A child’s potential outcome under a given regime depends on peers and teachers, requiring the need for multilevel methods of causal inference. The author considers studies of the impact of intended versus experienced instructional regimes. Both are important; however, intended regimes are well measured and accessible to randomized trials, whereas experienced instruction is measured with error and not amenable to randomization. Multiyear sequences of experienced instruction are of central interest but pose special methodological challenges. A 2-year study of intensive mathematics instruction illustrates these ideas.

Key Words: research on teaching • causal inference • classroom instruction • educational policy

American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 45, No. 1, 206-230 (2008)
DOI: 10.3102/0002831207312905


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHERHome page
R. G. Croninger and L. Valli
Mixing It Up About Methods
Educational Researcher, October 1, 2009; 38(7): 541 - 545.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHERHome page
R. G. Croninger and L. Valli
"Where Is the Action?" Challenges to Studying the Teaching of Reading in Elementary Classrooms
Educational Researcher, March 1, 2009; 38(2): 100 - 108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHERHome page
F. C. Sloane
Randomized Trials in Mathematics Education: Recalibrating the Proposed High Watermark
Educational Researcher, December 1, 2008; 37(9): 624 - 630.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



AER home page RER home page EPA home page JEB home page RRE home page