Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
American Educational Research Journal
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Borman, G. D.
Right arrow Articles by Chambers, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Teaching, Learning, and Human Development

Final Reading Outcomes of the National Randomized Field Trial of Success for All

Geoffrey D. Borman

University of Wisconsin–Madison

Robert E. Slavin

Johns Hopkins University and University of York

Alan C. K. Cheung

Hong Kong Institute of Education

Anne M. Chamberlain

Success for All Foundation

Nancy A. Madden and Bette Chambers

Johns Hopkins University and University of York

Using a cluster randomization design, schools were randomly assigned to implement Success for All, a comprehensive reading reform model, or control methods. This article reports final literacy outcomes for a 3-year longitudinal sample of children who participated in the treatment or control condition from kindergarten through second grade and a combined longitudinal and in-mover student sample, both of which were nested within 35 schools. Hierarchical linear model analyses of all three outcomes for both samples revealed statistically significant school-level effects of treatment assignment as large as one third of a standard deviation. The results correspond with the Success for All program theory, which emphasizes both comprehensive school-level reform and targeted student-level achievement effects through a multi-year sequencing of literacy instruction.

Key Words: educational policy • experimental design • school reform • Success for All

American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 44, No. 3, 701-731 (2007)
DOI: 10.3102/0002831207306743


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION AND POLICY ANALYSISHome page
G. D. Borman, N. M. Dowling, and C. Schneck
A Multisite Cluster Randomized Field Trial of Open Court Reading
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, December 1, 2008; 30(4): 389 - 407.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHERHome page
R. E. Slavin
Perspectives on Evidence-Based Research in Education--What Works? Issues in Synthesizing Educational Program Evaluations
Educational Researcher, January 1, 2008; 37(1): 5 - 14.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



AER home page RER home page EPA home page JEB home page RRE home page