Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
American Educational Research Journal
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hursh, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Social and Institutional Analysis

Assessing No Child Left Behind and the Rise of Neoliberal Education Policies

David Hursh

University of Rochester

No Child Left Behind and other education reforms promoting high-stakes testing, accountability, and competitive markets continue to receive wide support from politicians and public figures. This support, the author suggests, has been achieved by situating education within neoliberal policies that argue that such reforms are necessary within an increasingly globalized economy, will increase academic achievement, and will close the achievement gap. However, the author offers preliminary data suggesting that the reforms are not achieving their stated goals. Consequently, educators need to question whether neoliberal approaches to education should replace the previously dominant social democratic approaches.

Key Words: NCLB • high-stakes testing • education policy • neoliberalism

American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 44, No. 3, 493-518 (2007)
DOI: 10.3102/0002831207306764


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
REVIEW OF RESEARCH IN EDUCATIONHome page
G. Hull, J. Zacher, and L. Hibbert
Youth, Risk, and Equity in a Global World
Review of Research in Education, March 1, 2009; 33(1): 117 - 159.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Written CommunicationHome page
S. J. McCarthey
The Impact of No Child Left Behind on Teachers' Writing Instruction
Written Communication, October 1, 2008; 25(4): 462 - 505.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Education for Sustainable DevelopmentHome page
B. O. Manteaw
When Businesses Go to School: Neoliberalism and Education for Sustainable Development
Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, September 1, 2008; 2(2): 119 - 126.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHHome page
N. Dolby and A. Rahman
Research in International Education
Review of Educational Research, September 1, 2008; 78(3): 676 - 726.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



AER home page RER home page EPA home page JEB home page RRE home page