Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
American Educational Research Journal
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jenkins, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Ronk, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

How Special Education Preschool Graduates Finish: Status at 19 Years of Age

Joseph R. Jenkins

University of Washington

Philip S. Dale

University of New Mexico

Paulette E. Mills

Washington State University

Kevin N. Cole

Washington Research Institute

Constance Pious and Joan Ronk

University of Washington

This article reports the academic and special education status of 129 graduates of special education preschools at 19 years of age. Participants had been randomly assigned to either direct instruction or mediated learning preschool classrooms. At age 19, their achievement was approximately one standard deviation below average. Consistent with results at earlier follow-up points, program main effects were not significant; however, the Aptitude x Treatment interactions (ATIs) documented at earlier ages were absent. Sample differences among follow-up groups may account for the changed ATI findings. A combination of preschool child characteristics and early achievement accounted for 78% of final achievement variance. Male participants had higher achievement than female participants but were disproportionately placed in special education. Special education placement and disability classifications fluctuated over the course of schooling.

Key Words: early intervention • early intervention long-term effects • long-term follow-up • special education follow-up • special education graduates

American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 43, No. 4, 737-781 (2006)
DOI: 10.3102/00028312043004737


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Assessment for Effective InterventionHome page
J. P. Braden and S. R. Shaw
Intervention Validity of Cognitive Assessment: Knowns, Unknowables, and Unknowns
Assessment for Effective Intervention, March 1, 2009; 34(2): 106 - 115.
[Abstract] [PDF]



AER home page RER home page EPA home page JEB home page RRE home page