Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
American Educational Research Journal
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Coburn, C. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

Framing the Problem of Reading Instruction: Using Frame Analysis to Uncover the Microprocesses of Policy Implementation

Cynthia E. Coburn

University of California, Berkeley

Policy problems do not exist as social fact awaiting discovery. Rather, they are constructed as policymakers and constituents interpret a particular aspect of the social world as problematic. How a policy problem is framed is important because it assigns responsibility and creates rationales that authorize some policy solutions and not others. This article brings together sense-making theory and frame analysis to understand the dynamics of problem framing during policy implementation. Data were derived from a yearlong ethnographic study of one school’s response to the California Reading Initiative. Results showed that the school’s response depended on how school staff constructed their understanding of the relevant problem to be solved. The problem framing process was iterative and contested, shaped by authority relations and mediated by teachers’ social networks. Ultimately, it proved important for motivating and coordinating action, reshaping authority relations, and influencing teachers’ beliefs and practices.

Key Words: authority relations • policy implementation • problem framing • reading instruction • sense-making

American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 43, No. 3, 343-349 (2006)
DOI: 10.3102/00028312043003343


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Educational Administration QuarterlyHome page
L. C. Matsumura, M. Sartoris, D. D. Bickel, and H. E. Garnier
Leadership for Literacy Coaching: The Principal's Role in Launching a New Coaching Program
Educational Administration Quarterly, December 1, 2009; 45(5): 655 - 693.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHERHome page
A. I. Willis
EduPolitical Research: Reading Between the Lines
Educational Researcher, October 1, 2009; 38(7): 528 - 536.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHERHome page
J. P. Spillane
Policy, Politics, and the National Mathematics Advisory Panel Report: Topology, Functions, and Limits
Educational Researcher, December 1, 2008; 37(9): 638 - 644.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION AND POLICY ANALYSISHome page
C. E. Coburn and J. L. Russell
District Policy and Teachers' Social Networks
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, September 1, 2008; 30(3): 203 - 235.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



AER home page RER home page EPA home page JEB home page RRE home page