This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Booher-Jennings, J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Below the Bubble: "Educational Triage" and the Texas Accountability System

Columbia University

This article uses two dominant traditions in the organizational study of schools—the neoinstitutional and faculty workplace approaches—to explain an urban elementary school’s response to the Texas Accountability System. The findings indicate that teachers, guided by an institutional logic, sought to create the appearance of test score improvement by using a constellation of "educational triage" practices. Educational triage was manifest in the diversion of resources to students believed to be on the threshold of passing the Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills ("bubble kids") and to "accountable" students (those affecting the school’s accountability rating). Teachers also attempted to remove any liabilities to the school’s rating by referring these students for special education. To explain why teachers participated in educational triage, the author shows how the equation of good teaching with high test scores by the institutional environment and the district reconstituted both teacher professional identities and teacher-teacher relationships.

Key Words: accountability • data-driven decision making • testing

American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 42, No. 2, 231-268 (2005)
DOI: 10.3102/00028312042002231


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Koretz Moving Past No Child Left Behind Science, November 6, 2009; 326(5954): 803 - 804. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Mintrop and G. L. Sunderman Predictable Failure of Federal Sanctions-Driven Accountability for School Improvement--And Why We May Retain It Anyway Educational Researcher, June 1, 2009; 38(5): 353 - 364. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. L. Jennings and A. A. Beveridge How Does Test Exemption Affect Schools' and Students' Academic Performance? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, June 1, 2009; 31(2): 153 - 175. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. J. Vannest, L. Mahadevan, B. A. Mason, and K. K. Temple-Harvey Educator and Administrator Perceptions of the Impact of No Child Left Behind on Special Populations Remedial and Special Education, May 1, 2009; 30(3): 148 - 159. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Skerrett and A. Hargreaves Student Diversity and Secondary School Change in a Context of Increasingly Standardized Reform American Educational Research Journal, December 1, 2008; 45(4): 913 - 945. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. D. Ho The Problem With "Proficiency": Limitations of Statistics and Policy Under No Child Left Behind Educational Researcher, August 1, 2008; 37(6): 351 - 360. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. Au High-Stakes Testing and Curricular Control: A Qualitative Metasynthesis Educational Researcher, June 1, 2007; 36(5): 258 - 267. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Kelly and L. Monczunski Overcoming the Volatility in School-Level Gain Scores: A New Approach to Identifying Value Added With Cross-Sectional Data Educational Researcher, June 1, 2007; 36(5): 279 - 287. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Anagnostopoulos "Real Students"and "True Demotes": Ending Social Promotion and the Moral Ordering of Urban High Schools American Educational Research Journal, January 1, 2006; 43(1): 5 - 42. [Abstract] [PDF]