This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Rumberger, R. W. Articles by Palardy, G. J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Test Scores, Dropout Rates, and Transfer Rates as Alternative Indicators of High School Performance

University of California, Santa Barbara

Gregory J. Palardy

University of Georgia

This study investigated the relationships among several different indicators of high school performance: test scores, dropout rates, transfer rates, and attrition rates. Hierarchical linear models were used to analyze panel data from a sample of 14,199 students who took part in the National Education Longitudinal Survey of 1988. The results generally support the notion of an alternative as opposed to a common view of school effectiveness: Schools that are effective in promoting student learning (growth in achievement) are not necessarily effective in reducing dropout or transfer rates. In fact, after control for student inputs, high schools exhibit relatively little variability in dropout rates but considerable variation in transfer rates. In addition, characteristics of schools that contributed to performance in one area often did not contribute to performance in another. Given these findings, the authors suggest that, along with test scores, dropout and transfer rates should be used to judge school performance.

Key Words: dropouts • school effectiveness • student achievement

American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 42, No. 1, 3-42 (2005)
DOI: 10.3102/00028312042001003


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. J. Scheel, S. Madabhushi, and A. Backhaus The Academic Motivation of At-Risk Students in a Counseling Prevention Program The Counseling Psychologist, November 1, 2009; 37(8): 1147 - 1178. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Leithwood and D. Jantzi A Review of Empirical Evidence About School Size Effects: A Policy Perspective Review of Educational Research, March 1, 2009; 79(1): 464 - 490. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. N. Grubb Multiple Resources, Multiple Outcomes: Testing the "Improved"School Finance With NELS88 American Educational Research Journal, March 1, 2008; 45(1): 104 - 144. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. B. Stewart School Structural Characteristics, Student Effort, Peer Associations, and Parental Involvement: The Influence of School- and Individual-Level Factors on Academic Achievement Education and Urban Society, January 1, 2008; 40(2): 179 - 204. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. B. Stewart, E. A. Stewart, and R. L. Simons The Effect of Neighborhood Context on the College Aspirations of African American Adolescents American Educational Research Journal, December 1, 2007; 44(4): 896 - 919. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Anagnostopoulos "Real Students"and "True Demotes": Ending Social Promotion and the Moral Ordering of Urban High Schools American Educational Research Journal, January 1, 2006; 43(1): 5 - 42. [Abstract] [PDF]