This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Lee, J. Articles by Wong, K. K. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Impact of Accountability on Racial and Socioeconomic Equity: Considering Both School Resources and Achievement Outcomes

State University of New York at Buffalo

Kenneth K. Wong

Vanderbilt University

This article examines whether performance-driven educational accountability policy enhances or hinders equity. Combining data from state policy surveys, F-33, SASS, and NAEP, the article shows that during the 1990s, the states did not address racial and socioeconomic disparities in school resources and failed to narrow the achievement gaps among racial and socioeconomic groups. The distributions of school expenditures, class size, qualified teachers, and mathematics achievement remained largely unchanged in strong accountability states. Although the accountability policy of the 1990s neither produced adverse effects nor brought about significant setbacks in equity, this article suggests that racial and socioeconomic equity were not at the center of accountability reforms and that performance-driven accountability policies alone cannot move us forward toward equity.

Key Words: accountability • achievement gap • equity • school funding • school resources

American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 41, No. 4, 797-832 (2004)
DOI: 10.3102/00028312041004797


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. S. Reed Is There an Expectations Gap? Educational Federalism and the Demographic Distribution of Proficiency Cut Scores American Educational Research Journal, September 1, 2009; 46(3): 718 - 742. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Mintrop and G. L. Sunderman Predictable Failure of Federal Sanctions-Driven Accountability for School Improvement--And Why We May Retain It Anyway Educational Researcher, June 1, 2009; 38(5): 353 - 364. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Lee Is Test-Driven External Accountability Effective? Synthesizing the Evidence From Cross-State Causal-Comparative and Correlational Studies Review of Educational Research, September 1, 2008; 78(3): 608 - 644. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. V. Heilig and L. Darling-Hammond Accountability Texas-Style: The Progress and Learning of Urban Minority Students in a High-Stakes Testing Context Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, June 1, 2008; 30(2): 75 - 110. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Fuller, J. Wright, K. Gesicki, and E. Kang Gauging Growth: How to Judge No Child Left Behind? Educational Researcher, June 1, 2007; 36(5): 268 - 278. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Wong and G. Sunderman Education Accountability as a Presidential Priority: No Child Left Behind and the Bush Presidency Publius, May 16, 2007; (2007) pjm011v1. [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. E. Ryan, A. M. Ryan, K. Arbuthnot, and M. Samuels Students' Motivation for Standardized Math Exams Educational Researcher, January 1, 2007; 36(1): 5 - 13. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]