American Educational Research Journal

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Xue, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Meisels, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 41, No. 1, 191-229 (2004)
DOI: 10.3102/00028312041001191
© 2004 American Educational Research Association

Articles

Early Literacy Instruction and Learning in Kindergarten: Evidence From the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study—Kindergarten Class of 1998–1999

Yange Xue

University of Michigan

Samuel J. Meisels

Erikson Institute

Using a nationally representative sample of 13,609 kindergarten children in 2,690 classrooms and 788 schools from the base year of the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Kindergarten Class of 1998–1999, along with three-level hierarchical linear models, this study investigates the impact of early literacy instruction on kindergarten children’s learning, as measured by direct cognitive test scores, indirect teacher ratings of children’s achievement in language and literacy, and indirect teacher ratings of children’s approaches to learning. Two composite measures of phonics and integrated language arts are constructed from teachers’ reports of their instructional practices. Findings show that classroom mean outcomes were significantly higher when classroom teachers reported using both integrated language arts and phonics more often. However, children with low initial performance benefited less from integrated language arts instruction, as measured by direct measures of achievement; such differential effects of instruction were not observed for teacher ratings of children’s achievement and learning style. Policy implications of the findings are discussed.

Key Words: ECLS-K • kindergarten • literacy instruction • phonics • whole language


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION AND POLICY ANALYSISHome page
G. J. Palardy and R. W. Rumberger
Teacher Effectiveness in First Grade: The Importance of Background Qualifications, Attitudes, and Instructional Practices for Student Learning
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, June 1, 2008; 30(2): 111 - 140.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Early Childhood ResearchHome page
K. Bodovski and G. Farkas
do instructional practices contribute to inequality in achievement?: the case of mathematics instruction in kindergarten
Journal of Early Childhood Research, October 1, 2007; 5(3): 301 - 322.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Deaf Stud Deaf EducHome page
C. Mayer
What Really Matters in the Early Literacy Development of Deaf Children
J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ., October 1, 2007; 12(4): 411 - 431.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



AER home page RER home page EPA home page JEB home page RRE home page