|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Validity of IQ-Discrepancy Classifications of Reading Disabilities: A Meta-Analysis
Karla K. Stuebing,
Jack M. Fletcher and
Josette M. LeDoux
University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
G. Reid Lyon
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Sally E. Shaywitz and
Bennett A. Shaywitz
Yale University
According to federal regulations, children with reading difficulties are eligible for special education services under the learning disability category if they display reading skills that are significantly lower than their scores on intelligence (IQ) tests. Children who are poor readers but do not display this discrepancy are not eligible for special education. A meta-analysis involving 46 studies addressing the validity of this classification of poor readers revealed substantial overlap between the IQ-discrepant and IQ-consistent poor readers. Aggregated effect sizes were in the negligible range for the Behavior (–.05) and Achievement (–.12) domains but in the small range for the Cognitive Ability domain (.30). The latter effects were heterogeneous, with larger estimates showing higher performance by the IQ-discrepant poor readers. The size of the effects could be largely explained by the selection criteria used to form groups, indicating that variation in group definitions across studies accounted for variability in effect size estimates. These results provide little evidence supporting the validity of the IQ-discrepancy classification fundamental to public policy concerning students with learning disabilities and cast doubt on the need for IQ tests in identifying these students.
Key Words: IQ-discrepancy • IQ tests • learning disabilities • meta-analysis • reading disabilities
American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 39, No. 2,
469-518 (2002)
DOI: 10.3102/00028312039002469
 CiteULike  Complore  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
H. L. Swanson and C.-J. Hsieh
Reading Disabilities in Adults: A Selective Meta-Analysis of the Literature
Review of Educational Research,
December 1, 2009;
79(4):
1362 - 1390.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. J. Blanchett, J. K. Klingner, and B. Harry
The Intersection of Race, Culture, Language, and Disability: Implications for Urban Education
Urban Education,
July 1, 2009;
44(4):
389 - 409.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. A. Lange, G. Mulhern, and J. Wylie
Proofreading Using an Assistive Software Homophone Tool: Compensatory and Remedial Effects on the Literacy Skills of Students With Reading Difficulties
J Learn Disabil,
July 1, 2009;
42(4):
322 - 335.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. K. Katusic, R. C. Colligan, A. L. Weaver, and W. J. Barbaresi
The Forgotten Learning Disability: Epidemiology of Written-Language Disorder in a Population-Based Birth Cohort (1976-1982), Rochester, Minnesota
Pediatrics,
May 1, 2009;
123(5):
1306 - 1313.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y.-J. Liu, A. A. Ortiz, C. Y. Wilkinson, P. Robertson, and M. I. Kushner
From Early Childhood Special Education to Special Education Resource Rooms: Identification, Assessment, and Eligibility Determinations for English Language Learners With Reading-Related Disabilities
Assessment for Effective Intervention,
June 1, 2008;
33(3):
177 - 187.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. S. Daniel, A. K. Walsh, D. B. Goldston, E. M. Arnold, B. A. Reboussin, and F. B. Wood
Suicidality, School Dropout, and Reading Problems Among Adolescents
J Learn Disabil,
December 1, 2006;
39(6):
507 - 514.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. J. Lovett and L. J. Lewandowski
Gifted Students With Learning Disabilities: Who Are They?
J Learn Disabil,
December 1, 2006;
39(6):
515 - 527.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. D. Sideridis, P. L. Morgan, G. Botsas, S. Padeliadu, and D. Fuchs
Predicting LD on the Basis of Motivation, Metacognition, and Psychopathology: An ROC Analysis
J Learn Disabil,
June 1, 2006;
39(3):
215 - 229.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. M. Batsche, K. A. Kavale, and J. F. Kovaleski
Competing Views: A Dialogue on Response to Intervention
Assessment for Effective Intervention,
January 1, 2006;
32(1):
6 - 19.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Vaughn and L. S. Fuchs
A Response to "Competing Views: A Dialogue on Response to Intervention": Why Response to Intervention Is Necessary but Not Sufficient for Identifying Students With Learning Disabilities
Assessment for Effective Intervention,
January 1, 2006;
32(1):
58 - 61.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. M. Fletcher, C. Denton, and D. J. Francis
Validity of Alternative Approaches for the Identification of Learning Disabilities: Operationalizing Unexpected Underachievement
J Learn Disabil,
December 1, 2005;
38(6):
545 - 552.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. A. Kavale
Identifying Specific Learning Disability: Is Responsiveness to Intervention the Answer?
J Learn Disabil,
December 1, 2005;
38(6):
553 - 562.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. J. Francis, J. M. Fletcher, K. K. Stuebing, G. R. Lyon, B. A. Shaywitz, and S. E. Shaywitz
Psychometric Approaches to the Identification of LD: IQ and Achievement Scores Are Not Sufficient
J Learn Disabil,
April 1, 2005;
38(2):
98 - 108.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Xiangdong Yang, J. Shaftel, D. Glasnapp, and J. Poggio
Qualitative or Quantitative Differences?: Latent Class Analysis of Mathematical Ability for Special Education Students
Journal of Special Education,
February 1, 2005;
38(4):
194 - 207.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. P. Waber, M. D. Weiler, P. W. Forbes, J. H. Bernstein, D. C. Bellinger, and L. Rappaport
Neurobehavioral Factors Associated with Referral for Learning Problems in a Community Sample: Evidence for an Adaptational Model for Learning Disorders
J Learn Disabil,
October 1, 2003;
36(5):
467 - 483.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
