Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
American Educational Research Journal
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lomawaima, K. T.
Right arrow Articles by McCarty, T. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

When Tribal Sovereignty Challenges Democracy: American Indian Education and the Democratic Ideal

K. Tsianina Lomawaima and Teresa L. McCarty

University of Arizona

The lessons of American Indian education—a grand experiment in standardization—can lead to a more equitable educational system for all U.S. citizens. While masquerading as a tool for equal opportunity, standardization has marginalized Native peoples. We argue for diversity—not standardization—as a foundational value for a just multicultural democracy, but diversity is feared by some as a threat to the nation’s integrity. Critical historical analysis of the apparently contradictory policies and practices within American Indian education reveals a patterned response to cultural and linguistic diversity, as the federal government has attempted to distinguish "safe" from "dangerous" Native practices. Examples of the contest between Indigenous self-determination (rooted in internal sovereignty) and federal control illustrate the profound national ambivalence toward diversity but also the potential to nourish "places of difference" within a healthy democracy.

Key Words: American Indian education • critical democracy • federal Indian policy • multicultural education

American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 39, No. 2, 279-305 (2002)
DOI: 10.3102/00028312039002279


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Intervention in School and ClinicHome page
C. Pewewardy and M. Fitzpatrick
Working With American Indian Students and Families: Disabilities, Issues, and Interventions
Intervention in School and Clinic, November 1, 2009; 45(2): 91 - 98.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational PolicyHome page
L. B. Perry
Conceptualizing Education Policy in Democratic Societies
Educational Policy, May 1, 2009; 23(3): 423 - 450.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
REVIEW OF RESEARCH IN EDUCATIONHome page
C. O'Connor, L. D. Hill, and S. R. Robinson
Who's at Risk in School and What's Race Got to Do With It?
Review of Research in Education, March 1, 2009; 33(1): 1 - 34.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
REVIEW OF RESEARCH IN EDUCATIONHome page
B. M. J. Brayboy, A. E. Castagno, and E. Maughan
Chapter 6 Equality and Justice For All? Examining Race in Education Scholarship
Review of Research in Education, March 1, 2007; 31(1): 159 - 194.
[Full Text] [PDF]



AER home page RER home page EPA home page JEB home page RRE home page