This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (11) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Moss, P. A. Articles by Schutz, A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Educational Standards, Assessment, and the Search for Consensus

University of Michigan

Aaron Schutz

University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee

In this article, we critically examine the nature of the "consensus" reflected in educational standards used to orient high-stakes assessment programs. We analyze two complementary cases of practice in the assessment of teaching. One focuses on the discourse of standards creation and one examines how standards like these are typically used to orient assessment development and judgments about individual performance. We offer two (partially competing) theoretical perspectives that might illuminate and guide our practices in this currently undertheorized and underexamined area of standards development. One is based in the discourse ethics of Jürgen Habermas and one is based in critical elaborations of Hans-Georg Gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics. We argue that conventional consensus-seeking approaches to the development and public review of educational standards tend to mask diversity and relinquish authority for consequential decisions to assessment developers who work in far less public circumstances. We draw on hermeneutic philosophy to offer a more pluralist approach that allows dissensus to be represented and taken into account in the assessment process.

American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 38, No. 1, 37-70 (2001)
DOI: 10.3102/00028312038001037


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. A. Moss, D. C. Phillips, F. D. Erickson, R. E. Floden, P. A. Lather, and B. L. Schneider Learning From Our Differences: A Dialogue Across Perspectives on Quality in Education Research Educational Researcher, October 1, 2009; 38(7): 501 - 517. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. B. Dellinger and N. L. Leech Toward a Unified Validation Framework in Mixed Methods Research Journal of Mixed Methods Research, October 1, 2007; 1(4): 309 - 332. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. A. Moss The Meaning and Consequences of "Reliability" Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, January 1, 2004; 29(2): 245 - 249. [PDF]

				M. Chatterji Models and Methods for Examining Standards-Based Reforms and Accountability Initiatives: Have the Tools of Inquiry Answered Pressing Questions on Improving Schools? Review of Educational Research, January 1, 2002; 72(3): 345 - 386. [Abstract] [PDF]