This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Cook, T. D. Articles by Hunt, H. D. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Comer's School Development Program in Chicago: A Theory-Based Evaluation

Northwestern University

H. David Hunt

University of Southern Mississippi

Using fifth through eighth-grade students, the Comer School Development Program was evaluated in 10 inner city Chicago schools over 4 years, contrasting them with nine randomly selected no-treatment comparison schools. Comer schools implemented more program details than the controls but were not faithful to all program particulars. Students' ratings of the school's social climate improved soon after the program began. By the last 2 study years, both the students' and teachers' perceptions of the school's academic climate had also improved relative to the control schools. By these last years, Comer schools had gained about 3 percentile points more than the controls in both reading and math and students reported less acting out on a scale whose items are correlated with more serious offending in later life. Students in Comer schools also endorsed more conventional norms about misbehaving and reported greater ability to control their anger. However, the Comer program did not benefit either students' mental health or their participation in activities that adults consider wholesome. Explanations for the achievement and acting out results are offered based on student and staff data about school climate, on insights from an ethnography conducted in the program schools, and on contrast with the evaluation results from Prince George's County MD, where a different variant of the program failed to achieve any positive outcomes.

American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 37, No. 2, 535-597 (2000)
DOI: 10.3102/00028312037002535


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Boaler When Politics Took the Place of Inquiry: A Response to the National Mathematics Advisory Panel's Review of Instructional Practices Educational Researcher, December 1, 2008; 37(9): 588 - 594. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. A. Stuart Estimating Causal Effects Using School-Level Data Sets Educational Researcher, May 1, 2007; 36(4): 187 - 198. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. E. Kelly and R. K. Yin Strengthening Structured Abstracts for Education Research: The Need for Claim-Based Structured Abstracts Educational Researcher, April 1, 2007; 36(3): 133 - 138. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. W. Raudenbush, A. Martinez, and J. Spybrook Strategies for Improving Precision in Group-Randomized Experiments Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, March 1, 2007; 29(1): 5 - 29. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. M. Minke and K. J. Anderson Family School Collaboration and Positive Behavior Support Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, July 1, 2005; 7(3): 181 - 185. [PDF]

				G. D. Borman Chapter 1: National Efforts to Bring Reform to Scale in High-Poverty Schools: Outcomes and Implications Review of Research in Education, January 1, 2005; 29(1): 1 - 27. [PDF]

				T. D. Cook Randomized Experiments in Educational Policy Research: A Critical Examination of the Reasons the Educational Evaluation Community has Offered for not Doing Them Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, January 1, 2002; 24(3): 175 - 199. [Abstract] [PDF]