Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
American Educational Research Journal
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Firestone, W. A.
Right arrow Articles by Broadfoot, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

Power, Learning, and Legitimation: Assessment Implementation Across Levels in the United States and the United Kingdom

William A. Firestone

Rutgers University

John Fitz

University of Wales

Patricia Broadfoot

University of Bristol

Fieldwork conducted in two American states and in England and Wales helps to clarify the implementation of assessment policy at the central, local administrative (school and district), and classroom levels. This article examines implementation from three perspectives. The power perspective suggests that formal sanctions can result in educators attending to assessments but that such sanctions are not likely to change practice alone. A second perspective highlights what educators need to learn in order to change practice and the shortage of opportunities to do so. The legitimacy perspective attends to the ways in which policymakers generate confidence in their institutions at different levels and the conflicting criteria for supporting institutions. We conclude that assessment policy is useful for promoting easily observable changes but not deep modifications of teaching practice.

American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 36, No. 4, 759-793 (1999)
DOI: 10.3102/00028312036004759


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Applied Behavioral ScienceHome page
J. R. Detert and T. G. Pollock
Values, Interests, and the Capacity to Act: Understanding Professionals' Responses to Market-Based Improvement Initiatives in Highly Institutionalized Organizations
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, June 1, 2008; 44(2): 186 - 214.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am Educ Res JHome page
K. S. Finnigan and B. Gross
Do Accountability Policy Sanctions Influence Teacher Motivation? Lessons From Chicago's Low-Performing Schools
American Educational Research Journal, September 1, 2007; 44(3): 594 - 630.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



AER home page RER home page EPA home page JEB home page RRE home page