Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

American Educational Research Journal
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Loving, C. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Articles

From the Summit of Truth to Its Slippery Slopes: Science Education's Journey Through Positivist-Postmodern Territory

Cathleen C. Loving

Texas A&M University

This research seeks to justify the development of informed, balanced views regarding the positivist-postmodernist debate in science education. This is accomplished by clarifying origins and offering details on the current status of these two distinct positions. I attempt to illuminate what is an intense debate—but one often lacking focus and clear definitions. This is done by discussing (a) the origins of important stances, (b) problems with simplistic reductions to two extremes, (c) dubious extrapolations, and (d) perspectives for science education that strive for an even-handed approach to positions on the nature of science and the nature of learning in a multicultural society. Using both historical and philosophical interpretations of the issues, I conclude that current conceptions are oversimplified by some who promote extremes of both relativistic and strict hypothetico-deductive or inductive models related to what should be learned and what counts as science.

American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 34, No. 3, 421-452 (1997)
DOI: 10.3102/00028312034003421


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
REVIEW OF RESEARCH IN EDUCATIONHome page
O. Lee
Chapter 2: Promoting Scientific Inquiry With Elementary Students From Diverse Cultures and Languages
Review of Research in Education, January 1, 2002; 26(1): 23 - 69.
[PDF]


Home page
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHHome page
O. Lee
Equity Implications Based on the Conceptions of Science Achievement in Major Reform Documents
Review of Educational Research, January 1, 1999; 69(1): 83 - 115.
[Abstract] [PDF]



AER home page RER home page EPA home page JEB home page RRE home page