This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Hamilton, L. S. Articles by Snow, R. E. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Enhancing the Validity and Usefulness of Large-Scale Educational Assessments: II. NELS:88 Science Achievement

Stanford University

This study is second in a series demonstrating that achievement tests are multidimensional and that using psychologically meaningful subscores in national educational surveys can enhance test validity and usefulness. NELS:88 8th- and l0th-grade science tests were subjected to full information item factor analysis. Factors reflecting everyday knowledge, scientific reasoning, chemistry knowledge, and reasoning with knowledge were obtained in 8th grade. Quantitative science, spatial-mechanical, and basic knowledge and reasoning were distinguishable factors in 10th grade. Regression analyses showed that different patterns of prior math and science achievement, and of course taking, were associated with each l0th-grade science factor. Teacher emphasis on problem solving and understanding related more to quantitative science, and basic knowledge and reasoning. Spatial-mechanical reasoning showed the strongest gender and ethnicity effects; it related also to science museum visits but not to instructional variables. It is recommended that multidimensional achievement scores be used to capture student and teacher effects that total scores used alone miss.

American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 32, No. 3, 555-581 (1995)
DOI: 10.3102/00028312032003555


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. Seidel and R. J. Shavelson Teaching Effectiveness Research in the Past Decade: The Role of Theory and Research Design in Disentangling Meta-Analysis Results Review of Educational Research, December 1, 2007; 77(4): 454 - 499. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. VanTassel-Baska, G. Bass, R. Ries, D. Poland, and L. D. Avery A National Study of Science Curriculum Effectiveness With High Ability Students Gifted Child Quarterly, October 1, 1998; 42(4): 200 - 211. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. S. Hamilton Gender Differences on High School Science Achievement Tests: Do Format and Content Matter? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, January 1, 1998; 20(3): 179 - 195. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. Kupermintz and R. E. Snow Enhancing the Validity and Usefulness of Large-Scale Educational Assessments: III. NELS: 88 Mathematics Achievement to 12th Grade American Educational Research Journal, January 1, 1997; 34(1): 124 - 150. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. M. Nussbaum, L. S. Hamilton, and R. E. Snow Enhancing the Validity and Usefulness of Large-Scale Educational Assessments: IV NELS:88 Science Achievement to 12th Grade American Educational Research Journal, January 1, 1997; 34(1): 151 - 173. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. T. Burkam, V. E. Lee, and B. A. Smerdon Gender and Science Learning Early in High School: Subject Matter and Laboratory Experiences American Educational Research Journal, January 1, 1997; 34(2): 297 - 331. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. C. LePore and J. R. Warren A Comparison of Single-Sex and Coeducational Catholic Secondary Schooling: Evidence From the National Educational Longitudinal Study of 1988 American Educational Research Journal, January 1, 1997; 34(3): 485 - 511. [Abstract] [PDF]