This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Marsh, H. W. Articles by Roche, L. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Effects of Gifted and Talented Programs on Academic Self-Concept: The Big Fish Strikes Again

University of Western Sydney, Macarthur

Rhonda Craven

University of New South Wales, St. George

Lawrence Roche

University of Western Sydney, Macarthur

Participation in gifted and talented (G&T) programs is predicted to have negative effects on academic—but not nonacademic—self-concept on the basis of social comparison theory and Marsh’s big-fish-little-pond effect (BFLPE). In two studies, students in G&T programs experienced systematic declines in three components of academic self-concept (Reading, Math, School) over time and in relation to matched comparison students in regular mixed ability classrooms, but not in four components of nonacademic self-concept (Physical, Appearance, Peer Relations, Parent Relations). In both studies, these results were consistent over gender, age, and initial ability level. Selection criteria, program strategies, and advice to parents are proposed to counteract this BFLPE and to maximize the benefits associated with G&T programs.

American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 32, No. 2, 285-319 (1995)
DOI: 10.3102/00028312032002285


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. L. Cross and M. A. Swiatek Social Coping Among Academically Gifted Adolescents in a Residential Setting: A Longitudinal Study Gifted Child Quarterly, January 1, 2009; 53(1): 25 - 33. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Dijkstra, H. Kuyper, G. van der Werf, A. P. Buunk, and Y. G. van der Zee Social Comparison in the Classroom: A Review Review of Educational Research, December 1, 2008; 78(4): 828 - 879. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. W. Marsh, U. Trautwein, O. Ludtke, J. Baumert, and O. Koller The Big-Fish-Little-Pond Effect: Persistent Negative Effects of Selective High Schools on Self-Concept After Graduation American Educational Research Journal, September 1, 2007; 44(3): 631 - 669. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. N. Rinn Effects of Programmatic Selectivity on the Academic Achievement, Academic Self-Concepts, and Aspirations of Gifted College Students Gifted Child Quarterly, January 1, 2007; 51(3): 232 - 245. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Neihart The Socioaffective Impact of Acceleration and Ability Grouping: Recommendations for Best Practice Gifted Child Quarterly, January 1, 2007; 51(4): 330 - 341. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Wigfield, J. S. Eccles, and D. Rodriguez Chapter 3: The Development of Children's Motivation in School Contexts Review of Research in Education, January 1, 1998; 23(1): 73 - 118. [PDF]

				E. Windecker-Nelson, G. F. Melson, and S. M. Moon Intellectually Gifted Preschoolers' Perceived Competence: Relations to Maternal Attitudes, Concerns, and Support Gifted Child Quarterly, October 1, 1997; 41(4): 133 - 144. [Abstract] [PDF]