Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
American Educational Research Journal
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stodolsky, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Glaessner, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

Student Views About Learning Math and Social Studies

Susan S. Stodolsky, Scott Salk and Barbara Glaessner

University of Chicago

Math and social studies differ in the usual instructional pattern found in elementary classrooms, in the goals sought, and of course in the actual content. Based on documented differences in the two fields, we expected pupils to hold different ideas about how to learn each subject and to express different reasons for positive and negative experiences in each subject. Sixty fifth grade pupils from 11 classrooms were interviewed to explore their attitudes and conceptions about learning math and social studies. The interviews included pupils’ definitions of each school subject, descriptions of typical classroom activities, probes regarding how each subject was actually learned, and descriptions of times liked and disliked in each subject. Students’ conceptions and attitudes regarding math and social studies were different. Consistent with expectations, pupils characterized positive and negative experiences in math in regard to their success or ability to do the work while social studies experiences were evaluated more in terms of whether they were interesting or boring. Among other differences, more students thought they could learn social studies on their own than math.

American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 28, No. 1, 89-116 (1991)
DOI: 10.3102/00028312028001089


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am Educ Res JHome page
G. Nuthall
The Anatomy of Memory in the Classroom: Understanding How Students Acquire Memory Processes From Classroom Activities in Science and Social Studies Units
American Educational Research Journal, January 1, 2000; 37(1): 247 - 304.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHHome page
B. K. Hofer and P. R. Pintrich
The Development of Epistemological Theories: Beliefs About Knowledge and Knowing and Their Relation to Learning
Review of Educational Research, January 1, 1997; 67(1): 88 - 140.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am Educ Res JHome page
G. Nuthall and A. Alton-Lee
Assessing Classroom Learning: How Students Use Their Knowledge and Experience to Answer Classroom Achievement Test Questions in Science and Social Studies
American Educational Research Journal, January 1, 1995; 32(1): 185 - 223.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am Educ Res JHome page
W. P. Vispoel and J. R. Austin
Success and Failure in Junior High School: A Critical Incident Approach to Understanding Students' Attributional Beliefs
American Educational Research Journal, January 1, 1995; 32(2): 377 - 412.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
REVIEW OF RESEARCH IN EDUCATIONHome page
P. L. Grossman and S. S. Stodolsky
Chapter 4: Considerations of Content and the Circumstances of Secondary School Teaching
Review of Research in Education, January 1, 1994; 20(1): 179 - 221.
[PDF]


Home page
REVIEW OF RESEARCH IN EDUCATIONHome page
S. J. Thornton
Chapter 5: The Social Studies Near Century's End: Reconsidering Patterns of Curriculum and Instruction
Review of Research in Education, January 1, 1994; 20(1): 223 - 254.
[PDF]


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
S. Vaughn, J. S. Schumm, and J. Gordon
Which Motoric Condition Is Most Effective for Teaching Spelling to Students With and Without Learning Disabilities?
J Learn Disabil, March 1, 1993; 26(3): 191 - 198.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am Educ Res JHome page
D. A. Mason and T. L. Good
Effects of Two-Group and Whole-Class Teaching on Regrouped Elementary Students' Mathematics Achievement
American Educational Research Journal, January 1, 1993; 30(2): 328 - 360.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am Educ Res JHome page
G. Nuthall and A. Alton-Lee
Predicting Learning From Student Experience of Teaching: A Theory of Student Knowledge Construction in Classrooms
American Educational Research Journal, January 1, 1993; 30(4): 799 - 840.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
REVIEW OF RESEARCH IN EDUCATIONHome page
N. J. Gehrke, M. S. Knapp, and K. A. Sirotnik
Chapter 2: In Search of the School Curriculum
Review of Research in Education, January 1, 1992; 18(1): 51 - 110.
[PDF]



AER home page RER home page EPA home page JEB home page RRE home page