|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Student Views About Learning Math and Social Studies
Susan S. Stodolsky,
Scott Salk and
Barbara Glaessner
University of Chicago
Math and social studies differ in the usual instructional pattern found in elementary classrooms, in the goals sought, and of course in the actual content. Based on documented differences in the two fields, we expected pupils to hold different ideas about how to learn each subject and to express different reasons for positive and negative experiences in each subject. Sixty fifth grade pupils from 11 classrooms were interviewed to explore their attitudes and conceptions about learning math and social studies. The interviews included pupils definitions of each school subject, descriptions of typical classroom activities, probes regarding how each subject was actually learned, and descriptions of times liked and disliked in each subject. Students conceptions and attitudes regarding math and social studies were different. Consistent with expectations, pupils characterized positive and negative experiences in math in regard to their success or ability to do the work while social studies experiences were evaluated more in terms of whether they were interesting or boring. Among other differences, more students thought they could learn social studies on their own than math.
American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 28, No. 1,
89-116 (1991)
DOI: 10.3102/00028312028001089

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Nuthall
The Anatomy of Memory in the Classroom: Understanding How Students Acquire Memory Processes From Classroom Activities in Science and Social Studies Units
American Educational Research Journal,
January 1, 2000;
37(1):
247 - 304.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. K. Hofer and P. R. Pintrich
The Development of Epistemological Theories: Beliefs About Knowledge and Knowing and Their Relation to Learning
Review of Educational Research,
January 1, 1997;
67(1):
88 - 140.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Nuthall and A. Alton-Lee
Assessing Classroom Learning: How Students Use Their Knowledge and Experience to Answer Classroom Achievement Test Questions in Science and Social Studies
American Educational Research Journal,
January 1, 1995;
32(1):
185 - 223.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. P. Vispoel and J. R. Austin
Success and Failure in Junior High School: A Critical Incident Approach to Understanding Students' Attributional Beliefs
American Educational Research Journal,
January 1, 1995;
32(2):
377 - 412.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. L. Grossman and S. S. Stodolsky
Chapter 4: Considerations of Content and the Circumstances of Secondary School Teaching
Review of Research in Education,
January 1, 1994;
20(1):
179 - 221.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. J. Thornton
Chapter 5: The Social Studies Near Century's End: Reconsidering Patterns of Curriculum and Instruction
Review of Research in Education,
January 1, 1994;
20(1):
223 - 254.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Vaughn, J. S. Schumm, and J. Gordon
Which Motoric Condition Is Most Effective for Teaching Spelling to Students With and Without Learning Disabilities?
J Learn Disabil,
March 1, 1993;
26(3):
191 - 198.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. A. Mason and T. L. Good
Effects of Two-Group and Whole-Class Teaching on Regrouped Elementary Students' Mathematics Achievement
American Educational Research Journal,
January 1, 1993;
30(2):
328 - 360.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Nuthall and A. Alton-Lee
Predicting Learning From Student Experience of Teaching: A Theory of Student Knowledge Construction in Classrooms
American Educational Research Journal,
January 1, 1993;
30(4):
799 - 840.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. J. Gehrke, M. S. Knapp, and K. A. Sirotnik
Chapter 2: In Search of the School Curriculum
Review of Research in Education,
January 1, 1992;
18(1):
51 - 110.
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|