This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Speece, D. L Articles by Cooper, D. H Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Ontogeny of School Failure: Classification of First-Grade Children

University of Maryland at College Park

The ontogeny of school failure was addressed by examining the characteristics of 112 first-grade children, 63 of whom were considered at risk for school failure. Measures of achievement, intelligence, behavior, language, and learning potential were used with cluster analysis techniques to identify six empirically derived clusters that were replicated across two samples. Three profiles represented variations of normal performance, and three represented atypical patterns suggestive of learning disabilities, mild mental retardation, and language problems. These interpretations were validated by cluster differences on the degree of risk for referral, observed classroom behavior, and achievement variables not used in the cluster analysis. The variability of skills evident across the clusters, in addition to the composition of the clusters, suggested that teachers cope with a high degree of heterogeneity in their classrooms, that their referrals are not based solely on one dimension of children’s psychometric performance, and that certain multivariate profiles are associated with higher risk of referral. By capturing this variability it may be possible to design interventions that ameliorate the risk of failure for some groups of children.

American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 27, No. 1, 119-140 (1990)
DOI: 10.3102/00028312027001119


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. L. Trout, M. H. Epstein, R. Nelson, L. Synhorst, and K. Duppong Hurley Profiles of Children Served in Early Intervention Programs for Behavioral Disorders: Early Literacy and Behavioral Characteristics Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, January 1, 2006; 26(4): 206 - 218. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. L. Speece Hitting the Moving Target Known as Reading Development: Some Thoughts on Screening Children for Secondary Interventions J Learn Disabil, December 1, 2005; 38(6): 487 - 493. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. D. Ritchey and D. L. Speece Early Identification of Reading Disabilities: Current Status and New Directions Assessment for Effective Intervention, January 1, 2004; 29(4): 13 - 24. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. L. Hosp and D. J. Reschly Referral Rates for Intervention or Assessment: A Meta-Analysis of Racial Differences Journal of Special Education, August 1, 2003; 37(2): 67 - 80. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. W. Farmer, P. C. Rodkin, R. Pearl, and R. Van Acker Teacher-Assessed Behavioral Configurations, Peer-Assessments, and Self-Concepts of Elementary Students with Mild Disabilities Journal of Special Education, July 1, 1999; 33(2): 66 - 80. [Abstract] [PDF]

				V. R. Brewer, B. D. Moore III, and M. Hiscock Learning Disability Subtypes in Children with Neurofibromatosis J Learn Disabil, September 1, 1997; 30(5): 521 - 533. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. M. Kauffman, K. L.H. Wong, J. W. Lloyd, L. y. Hung, and P. L. Pullen What Puts Pupils at Risk? An Analysis of Classroom Teachers' Judgments of Pupils' Behavior Remedial and Special Education, September 1, 1991; 12(5): 7 - 16. [Abstract] [PDF]