This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Cohen, M. Articles by Riel, M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Effect of Distant Audiences on Students’ Writing

Ministry of Education, Jerusalem

Margaret Riel

InterLearn, California

Audience considerations play an important role in the development of text by experienced writers but are often nonexistent in the writing of school-age children. The lack of audience awareness found in school writing may index the slow development of the social-cognitive skills necessary to conceptualize different audiences or it may result from the decontextual approach to writing that is prevalent in classrooms. This study examined the quality of students’ writing in two audience conditions: to their teacher for a term assessment and to a distant peer audience to share ideas. Seventh-grade students wrote two compositions on the same topic, one addressed to peers in other countries via a computer network and the other to their teacher for their semester grade, counterbalanced for order effects. In both conditions, there was significantly higher ratings of the papers written to communicate with peers than those written to demonstrate skill in writing. The findings suggest that the development of functional writing environments to contextualize students’ work can lead to improvements in the quality of students’ classroom writing.

American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 26, No. 2, 143-159 (1989)
DOI: 10.3102/00028312026002143


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Ward Sr Squaring the Learning Circle: Cross-Classroom Collaborations and the Impact of Audience on Student Outcomes in Professional Writing Journal of Business and Technical Communication, January 1, 2009; 23(1): 61 - 82. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Wolfe Marginal Pedagogy: How Annotated Texts Affect a Writing-From-Sources Task Written Communication, April 1, 2002; 19(2): 297 - 333. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Volman and E. van Eck Gender Equity and Information Technology in Education: The Second Decade Review of Educational Research, January 1, 2001; 71(4): 613 - 634. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. A. MacArthur Using Technology to Enhance the Writing Processes of Students with Learning Disabilities J Learn Disabil, July 1, 1996; 29(4): 344 - 354. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. HARTMAN, C. M. NEUWIRTH, S. KIESLER, L. SPROULL, C. COCHRAN, M. PALMQUIST, and D. ZUBROW Patterns of Social Interaction and Learning to Write: Some Effects of Network Technologies Written Communication, January 1, 1991; 8(1): 79 - 113. [Abstract]