Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
American Educational Research Journal
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hativa, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

Computer-Based Drill and Practice in Arithmetic: Widening the Gap Between High- and Low-Achieving Students

Nira Hativa

Tel Aviv University

Precollege schools use their computers predominantly for drill and practice in arithmetic. It has been shown by research to be the most effective application of CAI (Computer-Assisted Instruction). The present study used naturalistic methods to examine differential effectiveness of CAI in arithmetic for high- and low-achieving students. Seven elementary school students with varied backgrounds with regard to socioeconomic status (SES), grade level, type of school, and achievements in arithmetic participated in the study. The study identifies strategies that students use to advance effectively through the levels of the CAI practice with material not yet studied in class. The study also discusses software- and hardware-related errors that students make while working with the CAI system. In many cases, these errors are unrelated to the knowledge of arithmetic. It seems that the low achievers, more than the high achievers, are prone to make these types of errors, which are partly responsible for ineffective CAI work. The study concludes that the higher achieving students observed were much more able than the observed low achievers to adjust to the special environment of computer work and to derive great benefits from it.

American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 25, No. 3, 366-397 (1988)
DOI: 10.3102/00028312025003366


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am Educ Res JHome page
Z. R. Mevarech and B. Kramarski
Improve: A Multidimensional Method For Teaching Mathematics in Heterogeneous Classrooms
American Educational Research Journal, January 1, 1997; 34(2): 365 - 394.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHHome page
R. E. Sutton
Equity and Computers in the Schools: A Decade of Research
Review of Educational Research, January 1, 1991; 61(4): 475 - 503.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Special EducationHome page
A. M. Hofmeister
Individual Differences and the form and Function of Instruction
Journal of Special Education, January 1, 1990; 24(2): 150 - 159.
[Abstract] [PDF]



AER home page RER home page EPA home page JEB home page RRE home page