Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
American Educational Research Journal
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Benbow, C. P.
Right arrow Articles by Minor, L. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

Mathematically Talented Males and Females and Achievement in the High School Sciences

Camilla Persson Benbow

Iowa State Unversity

Lola L. Minor

Johns Hopkins University

Mathematically talented youth, whether male or female, tend to have favorable attitudes toward science and to participate in the sciences at a level much higher than average. There were no overall sex differences in course-taking or course-grades in the sciences. Indications of sex differences favoring males, however, were found in participation in high school physics, the taking of and performance on high school and college level science achievement tests, and intention to major in the more quantitatively oriented fields of physics and engineering. No substantial sex differences in attitudes toward the sciences, except possibly physics, were detected. Overall attitude toward science did relate somewhat to participation in science. Moreover, sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability may explain some of the sex difference in science participation and achievement. These results may bear on why women are underrepresented in the sciences.

American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 23, No. 3, 425-436 (1986)
DOI: 10.3102/00028312023003425


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am Educ Res JHome page
J. E. Jacobs, L. L. Finken, N. L. Griffin, and J. D. Wright
The Career Plans of Science-Talented Rural Adolescent Girls
American Educational Research Journal, January 1, 1998; 35(4): 681 - 704.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Gifted Child QuarterlyHome page
K. A. Heller and A. Ziegler
Gender Differences in Mathematics and the Sciences: Can Attributional Retraining Improve the Performance of Gifted Females?
Gifted Child Quarterly, October 1, 1996; 40(4): 200 - 210.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
REVIEW OF RESEARCH IN EDUCATIONHome page
M. Sadker, D. Sadker, and S. Klein
Chapter 7: The Issue of Gender in Elementary and Secondary Education
Review of Research in Education, January 1, 1991; 17(1): 269 - 334.
[PDF]


Home page
Gifted Child QuarterlyHome page
E. J. Sowell, A. J. Zeigler, L. Bergwall, and R. M. Cartwright
Identification and Description of Mathematically Gifted Students: A Review of Empirical Research
Gifted Child Quarterly, October 1, 1990; 34(4): 147 - 154.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Gifted Child QuarterlyHome page
C. P. Benbow and L. L. Minor
Cognitive Profiles of Verbally and Mathematically Precocious Students: Implications for Identification of the Gifted
Gifted Child Quarterly, January 1, 1990; 34(1): 21 - 26.
[Abstract] [PDF]



AER home page RER home page EPA home page JEB home page RRE home page