Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
American Educational Research Journal
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ethington, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Wolfle, L. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

A Structural Model of Mathematics Achievement for Men and Women

Corinna A. Ethington

University of Illinois at Chicago

Lee M. Wolfle

Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

An extensive body of research indicates that men on the average achieve higher scores in mathematics than women. This paper addresses the issue of how this difference develops by estimating a latent-construct causal model of the process of mathematics achievement. When the model was compared between men and women, we found that the process of mathematics achievement differs. In particular, we found that mathematics ability and attitudes toward mathematics had stronger effects on mathematics achievement for men than for women. The interactions between sex and the variables in the model indicate that the process for men and women is not simply additive, and may be more complicated than previous researchers have assumed.

American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 23, No. 1, 65-75 (1986)
DOI: 10.3102/00028312023001065


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am Educ Res JHome page
H. W. Marsh and A. S. Yeung
Longitudinal Structural Equation Models of Academic Self-Concept and Achievement: Gender Differences in the Development of Math and English Constructs
American Educational Research Journal, January 1, 1998; 35(4): 705 - 738.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am Educ Res JHome page
H. W. Marsh and A. S. Yeung
Coursework Selection: Relations to Academic Self-Concept and Achievement
American Educational Research Journal, January 1, 1997; 34(4): 691 - 720.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am Educ Res JHome page
H. W. Marsh
The Multidimensional Structure of Academic Self-Concept: Invariance Over Gender and Age
American Educational Research Journal, January 1, 1993; 30(4): 841 - 860.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am Educ Res JHome page
H. W. Marsh
Sex Differences in the Development of Verbal and Mathematics Constructs: The High School and Beyond Study
American Educational Research Journal, January 1, 1989; 26(2): 191 - 225.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am Educ Res JHome page
D. Kfir
Achievements and Aspirations Among Boys and Girls in High School: A Comparison of Two Israeli Ethnic Groups
American Educational Research Journal, January 1, 1988; 25(2): 213 - 236.
[Abstract] [PDF]



AER home page RER home page EPA home page JEB home page RRE home page